↓ Skip to main content

Joint Genomic Prediction of Canine Hip Dysplasia in UK and US Labrador Retrievers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Joint Genomic Prediction of Canine Hip Dysplasia in UK and US Labrador Retrievers
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan M. Edwards, John A. Woolliams, John M. Hickey, Sarah C. Blott, Dylan N. Clements, Enrique Sánchez-Molano, Rory J. Todhunter, Pamela Wiener

Abstract

Canine hip dysplasia, a debilitating orthopedic disorder that leads to osteoarthritis and cartilage degeneration, is common in several large-sized dog breeds and shows moderate heritability suggesting that selection can reduce prevalence. Estimating genomic breeding values require large reference populations, which are expensive to genotype for development of genomic prediction tools. Combining datasets from different countries could be an option to help build larger reference datasets without incurring extra genotyping costs. Our objective was to evaluate genomic prediction based on a combination of UK and US datasets of genotyped dogs with records of Norberg angle scores, related to canine hip dysplasia. Prediction accuracies using a single population were 0.179 and 0.290 for 1,179 and 242 UK and US Labrador Retrievers, respectively. Prediction accuracies changed to 0.189 and 0.260, with an increased bias of genomic breeding values when using a joint training set (biased upwards for the US population and downwards for the UK population). Our results show that in this study of canine hip dysplasia, little or no benefit was gained from using a joint training set as compared to using a single population as training set. We attribute this to differences in the genetic background of the two populations as well as the small sample size of the US dataset.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,724,891
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,092
of 12,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,698
of 331,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#20
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,702 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.