↓ Skip to main content

Complex Landscape of Germline Variants in Brazilian Patients With Hereditary and Early Onset Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complex Landscape of Germline Variants in Brazilian Patients With Hereditary and Early Onset Breast Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovana T. Torrezan, Fernanda G. dos Santos R. de Almeida, Márcia C. P. Figueiredo, Bruna D. de Figueiredo Barros, Cláudia A. A. de Paula, Renan Valieris, Jorge E. S. de Souza, Rodrigo F. Ramalho, Felipe C. C. da Silva, Elisa N. Ferreira, Amanda F. de Nóbrega, Paula S. Felicio, Maria I. Achatz, Sandro J. de Souza, Edenir I. Palmero, Dirce M. Carraro

Abstract

Pathogenic variants in known breast cancer (BC) predisposing genes explain only about 30% of Hereditary Breast Cancer (HBC) cases, whereas the underlying genetic factors for most families remain unknown. Here, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify genetic variants associated to HBC in 17 patients of Brazil with familial BC and negative for causal variants in major BC risk genes (BRCA1/2, TP53, and CHEK2 c.1100delC). First, we searched for rare variants in 27 known HBC genes and identified two patients harboring truncating pathogenic variants in ATM and BARD1. For the remaining 15 negative patients, we found a substantial vast number of rare genetic variants. Thus, for selecting the most promising variants we used functional-based variant prioritization, followed by NGS validation, analysis in a control group, cosegregation analysis in one family and comparison with previous WES studies, shrinking our list to 23 novel BC candidate genes, which were evaluated in an independent cohort of 42 high-risk BC patients. Rare and possibly damaging variants were identified in 12 candidate genes in this cohort, including variants in DNA repair genes (ERCC1 and SXL4) and other cancer-related genes (NOTCH2, ERBB2, MST1R, and RAF1). Overall, this is the first WES study applied for identifying novel genes associated to HBC in Brazilian patients, in which we provide a set of putative BC predisposing genes. We also underpin the value of using WES for assessing the complex landscape of HBC susceptibility, especially in less characterized populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,508,366
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#5,529
of 12,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,964
of 327,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#72
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.