You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acute Stroke in Middle Cerebellar Peduncle in a Patient With FXTAS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2018.00187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah A. Hall, Avram Fraint, Rima Dafer |
| Abstract |
Background: Fragile-X associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is commonly associated with T2 hyperintensity in the middle cerebellar peduncles (MCP) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, ischemic stroke in the MCP in a patient with FXTAS has not previously been described. Case Description: A 61-year-old man with hypertension, sleep apnea, obesity, and FXTAS presented to the emergency department with 2 days of worsening balance and nausea which began 2 days after chiropractic neck manipulation. Examination revealed new nystagmus and worsening dysmetria. Workup revealed an acute infarct in the left MCP, atherosclerotic narrowing of the V4 segment of the left vertebral artery, inadequately controlled hypertension, and a LDL of 127. Conclusion: Isolated MCP infarcts are rare and typically associated with hypoperfusion in the setting of vertebral artery disease and neck manipulation. We suspect that underlying neurodegeneration due to FXTAS with superimposed small vessel disease and neck manipulation may have caused preferential damage to the Purkinje cells in the MCP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,125,271
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,021
of 13,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,865
of 347,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#29
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,853 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.