Title |
High Fructose Intake During Pregnancy in Rats Influences the Maternal Microbiome and Gut Development in the Offspring
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2018.00203 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stuart Astbury, Aleida Song, Mi Zhou, Brent Nielsen, Abha Hoedl, Benjamin P. Willing, Michael E. Symonds, Rhonda C. Bell |
Abstract |
Studies in pregnant women indicate the maternal microbiome changes during pregnancy so as to benefit the mother and fetus. In contrast, disruption of the maternal microbiota around birth can compromise normal bacterial colonisation of the infant's gastrointestinal tract. This may then inhibit development of the gut so as to increase susceptibility to inflammation and reduce barrier function. The impact of modulating fructose intake on the maternal microbiome through pregnancy is unknown, therefore we examined the effect of fructose supplementation on the maternal microbiome together with the immediate and next generation effects in the offspring. Wistar rat dams were divided into control and fructose fed groups that received 10% fructose in their drinking water from 8 weeks of age and throughout pregnancy (10-13 weeks). Maternal fecal and blood samples were collected pre-mating (9 weeks) and during early (gestational day 4-7) and late pregnancy (gestational day 19-21). We show supplementation of the maternal diet with fructose appears to significantly modulate the maternal microbiome, with a significant reduction in Lactobacillus and Bacteroides. In offspring maintained on this diet up to pregnancy and term there was a reduction in gene expression of markers of gut barrier function that could adversely affect its function. An exacerbated insulin response to pregnancy, reduced birth weight, but increased fat mass was also observed in these offspring. In conclusion dietary supplementation with fructose modulates the maternal microbiome in ways that could adversely affect fetal growth and later gut development. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 15% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Singapore | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 53 | 50% |