↓ Skip to main content

Insights Into de novo Mutation Variation in Lithuanian Exome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights Into de novo Mutation Variation in Lithuanian Exome
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Pranckėnienė, Audronė Jakaitienė, Laima Ambrozaitytė, Ingrida Kavaliauskienė, Vaidutis Kučinskas

Abstract

In the last decade, one of the biggest challenges in genomics research has been to distinguish definitive pathogenic variants from all likely pathogenic variants identified by next-generation sequencing. This task is particularly complex because of our lack of knowledge regarding overall genome variation and pathogenicity of the variants. Therefore, obtaining sufficient information about genome variants in the general population is necessary as such data could be used for the interpretation of de novo mutations (DNMs) in the context of patient's phenotype in cases of sporadic genetic disease. In this study, data from whole-exome sequencing of the general population in Lithuania were directly examined. In total, 84 (VarScan) and 95 (VarSeqTM) DNMs were identified and validated using different algorithms. Thirty-nine of these mutations were considered likely to be pathogenic based on gene function, evolutionary conservation, and mutation impact. The mutation rate estimated per position pair per generation was 2.74 × 10-8 [95% CI: 2.24 × 10-8-3.35 × 10-8] (VarScan) and 2.4 × 10-8 [95% CI: 1.96 × 10-8-2.99 × 10-8] (VarSeqTM), with 1.77 × 10-8 [95% CI: 6.03 × 10-9-5.2 × 10-8] de novo indels per position per generation. The rate of germline DNMs in the Lithuanian population and the effects of the genomic and epigenetic context on DNM formation were calculated for the first time in this study, providing a basis for further analysis of DNMs in individuals with genetic diseases. Considering these findings, additional studies in patient groups with genetic diseases with unclear etiology may facilitate our ability to distinguish certain pathogenic or adaptive DNMs from tolerated background DNMs and to reliably identify disease-causing DNMs by their properties through direct observation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#7,177
of 12,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,706
of 331,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#149
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.