↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Prediction of Complex Phenotypes Using Genic Similarity Based Relatedness Matrix

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic Prediction of Complex Phenotypes Using Genic Similarity Based Relatedness Matrix
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2018.00364
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ning Gao, Jinyan Teng, Shaopan Ye, Xiaolong Yuan, Shuwen Huang, Hao Zhang, Xiquan Zhang, Jiaqi Li, Zhe Zhang

Abstract

In the last years, a series of methods for genomic prediction (GP) have been established, and the advantages of GP over pedigree best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) have been reported. However, the majority of previously proposed GP models are purely based on mathematical considerations while seldom take the abundant biological knowledge into account. Prediction ability of those models largely depends on the consistency between the statistical assumptions and the underlying genetic architectures of traits of interest. In this study, gene annotation information was incorporated into GP models by constructing haplotypes with SNPs mapped to genic regions. Haplotype allele similarity between pairs of individuals was measured through different approaches at single gene level and then converted into whole genome level, which was then treated as a special kernel and used in kernel based GP models. Results shown that the gene annotation guided methods gave higher or at least comparable predictive ability in some traits, especially in the Arabidopsis dataset and the rice breeding population. Compared to SNP models and haplotype models without gene annotation, the gene annotation based models improved the predictive ability by 0.56~26.67% in the Arabidopsis and 1.62~16.53% in the rice breeding population, respectively. However, incorporating gene annotation slightly improved the predictive ability for several traits but did not show any extra gain for the rest traits in a chicken population. In conclusion, integrating gene annotation into GP models could be beneficial for some traits, species, and populations compared to SNP models and haplotype models without gene annotation. However, more studies are yet to be conducted to implicitly investigate the characteristics of these gene annotation guided models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Computer Science 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,140,033
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,595
of 12,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,397
of 335,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#94
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.