You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Efficiencies of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing, Karyotyping, and Chromosomal Micro-Array for Diagnosing Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies in the Second and Third Trimesters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.00069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yiyang Zhu, Qunda Shan, Jiayong Zheng, Qunxi Cai, Huanli Yang, Jianhong Zhang, Xiaodong Du, Fan Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,711,219
of 23,856,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,740
of 12,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,714
of 354,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#138
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,856,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.