The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality Control of Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.00387 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keith R. Shockley, Shuva Gupta, Shawn F. Harris, Soumendra N. Lahiri, Shyamal D. Peddada |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,526
of 12,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,302
of 351,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#103
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.