You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interrogating the Evolutionary Paradox of Schizophrenia: A Novel Framework and Evidence Supporting Recent Negative Selection of Schizophrenia Risk Alleles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.00389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenxing Liu, Ian Everall, Christos Pantelis, Chad Bousman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 71% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,081,473
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#177
of 13,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,791
of 365,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#12
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,838 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.