The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Embracing Ambiguity in the Taxonomic Classification of Microbiome Sequencing Data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.01022 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nidhi Shah, Jacquelyn S. Meisel, Mihai Pop |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 26% |
Researcher | 4 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,372,963
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#538
of 13,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,222
of 372,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#31
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,884 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.