↓ Skip to main content

Validation of a Novel, Sensitive, and Specific Urine-Based Test for Recurrence Surveillance of Patients With Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Comprehensive Multicenter Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of a Novel, Sensitive, and Specific Urine-Based Test for Recurrence Surveillance of Patients With Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Comprehensive Multicenter Study
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, December 2019
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2019.01237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Batista, João Vinagre, Hugo Prazeres, Cristina Sampaio, Pedro Peralta, Paulo Conceição, Amílcar Sismeiro, Ricardo Leão, Andreia Gomes, Frederico Furriel, Carlos Oliveira, João Nuno Torres, Pedro Eufrásio, Paulo Azinhais, Fábio Almeida, Edwin Romero Gonzalez, Bohdan Bidovanets, Thorsten Ecke, Pascal Stinjs, Álvaro Serrano Pascual, Rabehi Abdelmalek, Ainara Villafruela, Pastora Beardo-Villar, Nuno Fidalgo, Hakan Öztürk, Carmen Gonzalez-Enguita, Juan Monzo, Tomé Lopes, Mario Álvarez-Maestro, Patricia Parra Servan, Santiago Moreno Perez De La Cruz, Mario Pual Sanchez Perez, Valdemar Máximo, Paula Soares

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 12 25%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Engineering 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,404,679
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,959
of 12,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,670
of 458,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#124
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.