↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the Performance of Microsatellites and RADseq in Population Genetic Studies: Analysis of Data for Pike (Esox lucius) and a Synthesis of Previous Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the Performance of Microsatellites and RADseq in Population Genetic Studies: Analysis of Data for Pike (Esox lucius) and a Synthesis of Previous Studies
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2020.00218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Sunde, Yeşerin Yıldırım, Petter Tibblin, Anders Forsman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 52 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 21%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Engineering 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,149,265
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,617
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,850
of 364,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#137
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.