↓ Skip to main content

Sequencing Shorter cfDNA Fragments Decreases the False Negative Rate of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequencing Shorter cfDNA Fragments Decreases the False Negative Rate of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2020.00280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Xue, Guodong Zhao, Longwei Qiao, Jiafeng Lu, Bin Yu, Ting Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Engineering 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,478,213
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,021
of 12,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,107
of 368,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#123
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.