The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Whole Genome Sequencing Reveals Signatures for Artificial Selection for Different Sizes in Japanese Primitive Dog Breeds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2021.671686 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guangqi Lyu, Chunyu Feng, Shiyu Zhu, Shuang Ren, Wanyi Dang, David M. Irwin, Zhe Wang, Shuyi Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Linguistics | 1 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,935,776
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,213
of 12,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,085
of 437,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#44
of 731 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 731 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.