The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of subtypes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and construction of a prognostic model based on fatty acid metabolism genes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2022.1013178 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shiwen Nie, Youlong Huili, Anliang Yao, Jian Liu, Yong Wang, Lei Wang, Liguo Zhang, Shaosan Kang, Fenghong Cao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,276,227
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,669
of 12,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,618
of 406,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#276
of 1,179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.