You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical value of M1 macrophage-related genes identification in bladder urothelial carcinoma and in vitro validation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2022.1047004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Yu, Yuexi Huang, Chen Li, Santao Ou, Chaojie Xu, Zhengjun Kang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#14,536,385
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,047
of 12,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,698
of 403,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#146
of 749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.