The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Statistical Approach of the Role of the Conserved CSB-PiggyBac Transposase Fusion Protein (CSB-PGBD3) in Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Cockayne Syndrome Type B
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2022.762047 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rayanne Damaj-Fourcade, Nicolas Meyer, Cathy Obringer, Nicolas Le May, Nadège Calmels, Vincent Laugel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#14,556,454
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,053
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,587
of 439,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#216
of 915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.