The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and validation of a novel necroptosis-related score to improve the outcomes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2022.967613 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji Chen, Qiqi Tao, Zhichao Lang, Yan Jin, Guanqi Chen, Xinling Li, Zhixian Yu, Yeping Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,913,395
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#7,358
of 12,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,050
of 434,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#502
of 1,152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.