↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic model and immunotherapy prediction based on molecular chaperone-related lncRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic model and immunotherapy prediction based on molecular chaperone-related lncRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2022.975905
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Xu, Tao Tao, Shi Li, Shuzhen Tan, Haiyan Liu, Xiao Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,346,498
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,003
of 12,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,577
of 438,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#111
of 1,086 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,086 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.