The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Technical feasibility of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy by next-generation DNA sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2023.1095600 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bennett O. V. Shum, Ilya Henner, Anita Cairns, Carel Pretorius, Urs Wilgen, Paulette Barahona, Jacobus P. J. Ungerer, Glenn Bennett |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,684,917
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#356
of 12,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,510
of 433,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#6
of 630 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 630 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.