The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In silico analysis to identify novel ceRNA regulatory axes associated with gallbladder cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2023.1107614 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neeraj Saklani, Varnit Chauhan, Javed Akhtar, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Ravi Sirdeshmukh, Poonam Gautam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,058,649
of 23,837,558 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#5,755
of 12,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,947
of 424,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#260
of 733 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,837,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 733 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.