You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-expression and interaction network analysis reveals dysregulated neutrophil and T-cell activation as the core mechanism associated with septic shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2023.1132361 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaobo Zhao, Kun Zhu, Xiaoyi Li, Xiaohui Zhong, Yanan Zhao, Zhenkai Le, Zhicong Liu, Yi Xiao, Dengming Lai, Na Jiao, Qiang Shu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,987,031
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,382
of 13,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,290
of 426,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#90
of 668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.