↓ Skip to main content

Chinese patients with 3M syndrome: clinical manifestations and two novel pathogenic variants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese patients with 3M syndrome: clinical manifestations and two novel pathogenic variants
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2023.1164936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ningan Xu, Kangxiang Liu, Yongjia Yang, Xiaoming Li, Yan Zhong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#21,632,763
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#8,281
of 14,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,407
of 365,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#155
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.