↓ Skip to main content

Examining interactions between polygenic scores and interpersonal trauma exposure on alcohol consumption and use disorder in an ancestrally diverse college cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining interactions between polygenic scores and interpersonal trauma exposure on alcohol consumption and use disorder in an ancestrally diverse college cohort
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2023.1274381
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina M. Sheerin, Rowan K. O’Hara-Payne, Eva E. Lancaster, Hailie Suarez-Rivas, Spit for Science Working Group, Chris Chatzinakos, Elizabeth C. Prom-Wormley, Roseann E. Peterson, Fazil Aliev, Amy E. Adkins, Ananda Amstadter, Thomas Bannard, Peter Barr, Erin C. Berenz, Katie Bountress, Holly Byers, A. Christian Pais, Erin Caraway, James S. Clifford, Megan Cooke, Karen Chartier, Seung B. Cho, Elizabeth Do, Danielle M. Dick, Alexis C. Edwards, Renolda Gelzinis, Neeru Goyal, Sage Hawn, Laura M. Hack, Lisa J. Halberstadt, Sally Kuo, Jacquelyn L. Meyers, Emily Lasko, Jennifer Lend, Emily Lilley, Mackenzie Lind, Elizabeth Long, Alexandra Martelli, Arden Moscati, Anne Morris, Ashlee Moore, Kerry Mitchell, Aashir Nasim, Zoe Neale, Jill Opalesky, Cassie Overstreet, Kimberly Pedersen, Roseann E. Peterson, Tarah Raldiris, Brien Riley, Jessica Salvatore, Jeanne Savage, David Sosnowski, Rebecca Smith, Jinni Su, Cuie Sun, Nathaniel Thomas, Chloe Walker, Marcie Walsh, Bradley T. Webb, Teresa Willoughby, Brandon Wormley, Madison Woodroof, Jia Yan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,224,674
of 26,408,935 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,047
of 13,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,443
of 380,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#18
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,408,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.