The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Clinical, imaging, and genetic characteristics of type B niemann pick disease combined with segawa syndrome diagnosed via dual gene sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2024.1391936 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fang Wu, Dongying Su, Weisi Wang, Xia Song, Shufeng Fan, Jinzhan Su, Linying Ma, Jianxia Xu, Qinpan Rao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,259,111
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#9,696
of 13,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,962
of 143,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#22
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.