↓ Skip to main content

Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency: review of the clinical phenotype and metabolic/genomic approach to diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency: review of the clinical phenotype and metabolic/genomic approach to diagnosis
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2024.1405468
Authors

Kevin E. Glinton, Charul Gijavanekar, Abbhirami Rajagopal, Laura P. Mackay, Kirt A. Martin, Phillip L. Pearl, K. Michael Gibson, Theresa A. Wilson, V. Reid Sutton, Sarah H. Elsea

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#14,785,463
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,003
of 13,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,287
of 156,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#10
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.