↓ Skip to main content

Molecular and physiological responses of two quinoa genotypes to drought stress

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular and physiological responses of two quinoa genotypes to drought stress
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2024.1439046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaolin Zhu, Wenyu Liu, Baoqiang Wang, Ling Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,071,482
of 26,442,002 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,325
of 13,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,567
of 137,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#12
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,442,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.