↓ Skip to main content

TF-EPI: an interpretable enhancer-promoter interaction detection method based on Transformer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TF-EPI: an interpretable enhancer-promoter interaction detection method based on Transformer
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2024.1444459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bowen Liu, Weihang Zhang, Xin Zeng, Martin Loza, Sung-Joon Park, Kenta Nakai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#16,787,623
of 26,443,530 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#4,621
of 13,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,339
of 137,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#8
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,443,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,984 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.