The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A retrospective review of α-gal syndrome complicating the management of suspected pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in one gastroenterology clinic in central Virginia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Gastroenterology, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgstr.2023.1162109 |
| Authors |
Nathan E. Richards, Jeffrey M. Wilson, Thomas A. E. Platts-Mills, Robert D. Richards |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,837,686
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Gastroenterology
#21
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,997
of 370,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Gastroenterology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.