You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The value of generalized linear mixed models for data analysis in the plant sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Horticulture, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fhort.2024.1423462 |
| Authors |
Laurence V. Madden, Peter S. Ojiambo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,339,469
of 26,199,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Horticulture
#1
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,632
of 152,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Horticulture
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,199,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them