The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adjuvants for Leishmania vaccines: from models to clinical application
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00144 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vanitha S. Raman, Malcolm S. Duthie, Christopher B. Fox, Greg Matlashewski, Steven G. Reed |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 131 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Professor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 21% |
Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 33% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 9% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#6,171
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,379
of 250,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#26
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.