↓ Skip to main content

Homeostasis of lymphocytes and monocytes in frequent blood donors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homeostasis of lymphocytes and monocytes in frequent blood donors
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert B. Ratts, Nan-Ping Weng

Abstract

Age-associated decline of immune function is believed to be mainly due to alterations of immune cells. However, longitudinal changes of human immune cells with age have not yet been adequately addressed. To test the hypothesis that regeneration of lymphocytes and monocytes is robust throughout most of adult life until advanced age, we examined six leukapheresis donors (3 young and 3 middle-aged/old) who donated approximately 10% of their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) every other month over 3-5 years. We found the number of both lymphocytes and monocytes were quite stable in the blood of all six donors. As expected, young donors had more T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), CD31{}(+) cells (CD4 only) and longer telomeres in T cells than did the middle-aged donors. Interestingly, more variation in TREC number, Vβ usages, and telomere lengths were observed in young donors during the 3-5 years course of donation whereas the middle-aged/old donors showed a rather striking stability in these measurements. This may reflect a more prominent role of thymic output in T cell regeneration in young than in middle-aged/old donors. Together, these findings provide an in vivo glimpse into the homeostasis of lymphocytes and monocytes in the blood at different ages, and support the notion that regeneration of lymphocytes and monocytes is robust throughout adult life up to the early 70s.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,417
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,476
of 250,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#161
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.