↓ Skip to main content

IL-1 family cytokines trigger sterile inflammatory disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IL-1 family cytokines trigger sterile inflammatory disease
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00315
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Lukens, Jordan M. Gross, Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti

Abstract

Inflammation plays vital roles in protective responses against pathogens and tissue repair, however, improper resolution of inflammatory networks is centrally involved in the pathogenesis of many acute and chronic diseases. Extensive advances have been made in recent years to define the inflammatory processes that are required for pathogen clearance, however, in comparison, less is known about the regulation of inflammation in sterile settings. Over the past decade non-communicable chronic diseases that are potentiated by sterile inflammation have replaced infectious diseases as the major threat to global human health. Thus, improved understanding of the sterile inflammatory process has emerged as one of the most important areas of biomedical investigation during our time. In this review we highlight the central role that interleukin-1 family cytokines play in sterile inflammatory diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
India 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 152 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 23%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,113
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,775
of 250,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#62
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.