↓ Skip to main content

Current understanding of the Trypanosoma cruzi-cardiomyocyte interaction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current understanding of the Trypanosoma cruzi-cardiomyocyte interaction
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia M. Calvet, Tatiana G. Melo, Luciana R. Garzoni, Francisco O. R. Oliveira, Dayse T. Silva Neto, N. S. L. Maria, L. Meirelles, Mirian C. S. Pereira

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiological agent of Chagas disease, exhibits multiple strategies to ensure its establishment and persistence in the host. Although this parasite has the ability to infect different organs, heart impairment is the most frequent clinical manifestation of the disease. Advances in knowledge of T. cruzi-cardiomyocyte interactions have contributed to a better understanding of the biological events involved in the pathogenesis of Chagas disease. This brief review focuses on the current understanding of molecules involved in T. cruzi-cardiomyocyte recognition, the mechanism of invasion, and on the effect of intracellular development of T. cruzi on the structural organization and molecular response of the target cell.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2012.
All research outputs
#23,637,102
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#28,469
of 32,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,203
of 254,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#163
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.