↓ Skip to main content

IRGM in autophagy and viral infections

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IRGM in autophagy and viral infections
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00426
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denitsa S. Petkova, Christophe Viret, Mathias Faure

Abstract

Autophagy is a cell autonomous process allowing each individual cell to fight intracellular pathogens. Autophagy can destroy pathogens within the cytosol, and can elicit innate and adaptive immune responses against microorganisms. Nevertheless, numerous pathogens have developed molecular strategies enabling them to avoid or even exploit autophagy for their own benefit. IRGM (immunity-related GTPase family M) is a human protein recently highlighted for its contribution to autophagy upon infections. The physical association of IRGM with mitochondria and different autophagy-regulating proteins, ATG5, ATG10, SH3GLB1, and LC3, contribute to explain how IRGM could regulate autophagy. Whereas IRGM is involved in autophagy-mediated immunity against bacteria, certain viruses seem to have developed strategies to manipulate autophagy through the selective targeting of this protein. Furthermore, irgm variants are linked to infection-associated human pathologies such as the inflammatory Crohn's disease. Here, we discuss how IRGM might contribute to human autophagy upon viral infection, and why its targeting might be beneficial to virus replication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 31%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,649,940
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,790
of 32,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,372
of 291,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#224
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.