↓ Skip to main content

Immunodeficiency in DiGeorge Syndrome and Options for Treating Cases with Complete Athymia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunodeficiency in DiGeorge Syndrome and Options for Treating Cases with Complete Athymia
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00322
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Graham Davies

Abstract

The commonest association of thymic stromal deficiency resulting in T-cell immunodeficiency is the DiGeorge syndrome (DGS). This results from abnormal development of the third and fourth pharyngeal arches and is most commonly associated with a microdeletion at chromosome 22q11 though other genetic and non-genetic causes have been described. The immunological competence of affected individuals is highly variable, ranging from normal to a severe combined immunodeficiency when there is complete athymia. In the most severe group, correction of the immunodeficiency can be achieved using thymus allografts which can support thymopoiesis even in the absence of donor-recipient matching at the major histocompatibility loci. This review focuses on the causes of DGS, the immunological features of the disorder, and the approaches to correction of the immunodeficiency including the use of thymus transplantation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Other 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 8%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,703,734
of 26,779,733 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,424
of 33,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,856
of 294,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#166
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,779,733 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.