↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic Implications of Immunogenic Cell Death in Human Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic Implications of Immunogenic Cell Death in Human Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Palombo, Chiara Focaccetti, Vincenzo Barnaba

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are central to the adoptive immune response, and their function is regulated by diverse signals in a context-specific manner. Different DCs have been described in physiologic conditions, inflammation, and cancer, prompting a series of questions on how adoptive immune responses, or tolerance, develop against tumors. Increasing evidence suggests that tumor treatments induce a dramatic change on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and, in particular, on some DC subtypes. In this review, we summarize the latest evidence on the role of DCs in cancer and preliminary evidence on chemotherapy-associated antigens identified in human cancers.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,927,037
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#12,034
of 33,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,049
of 323,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#31
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.