↓ Skip to main content

Staphylococcus aureus Colonization: Modulation of Host Immune Response and Impact on Human Vaccine Design

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
476 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Staphylococcus aureus Colonization: Modulation of Host Immune Response and Impact on Human Vaccine Design
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisling F. Brown, John M. Leech, Thomas R. Rogers, Rachel M. McLoughlin

Abstract

In apparent contrast to its invasive potential Staphylococcus aureus colonizes the anterior nares of 20-80% of the human population. The relationship between host and microbe appears particularly individualized and colonization status seems somehow predetermined. After decolonization, persistent carriers often become re-colonized with their prior S. aureus strain, whereas non-carriers resist experimental colonization. Efforts to identify factors facilitating colonization have thus far largely focused on the microorganism rather than on the human host. The host responds to S. aureus nasal colonization via local expression of anti-microbial peptides, lipids, and cytokines. Interplay with the co-existing microbiota also influences colonization and immune regulation. Transient or persistent S. aureus colonization induces specific systemic immune responses. Humoral responses are the most studied of these and little is known of cellular responses induced by colonization. Intriguingly, colonized patients who develop bacteremia may have a lower S. aureus-attributable mortality than their non-colonized counterparts. This could imply a staphylococcal-specific immune "priming" or immunomodulation occurring as a consequence of colonization and impacting on the outcome of infection. This has yet to be fully explored. An effective vaccine remains elusive. Anti-S. aureus vaccine strategies may need to drive both humoral and cellular immune responses to confer efficient protection. Understanding the influence of colonization on adaptive response is essential to intelligent vaccine design, and may determine the efficacy of vaccine-mediated immunity. Clinical trials should consider colonization status and the resulting impact of this on individual patient responses. We urgently need an increased appreciation of colonization and its modulation of host immunity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 467 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 17%
Student > Master 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 70 15%
Unknown 125 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 63 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 2%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 141 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,741
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,187
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#63
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.