↓ Skip to main content

PD-1HIGH Follicular CD4 T Helper Cell Subsets Residing in Lymph Node Germinal Centers Correlate with B Cell Maturation and IgG Production in Rhesus Macaques

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PD-1HIGH Follicular CD4 T Helper Cell Subsets Residing in Lymph Node Germinal Centers Correlate with B Cell Maturation and IgG Production in Rhesus Macaques
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huanbin Xu, Xiaolei Wang, Andrew A. Lackner, Ronald S. Veazey

Abstract

CD4+ T follicular helper (TFH) cells guide development and maturation of B cells and are crucial for effective antibody responses. Here we found rhesus macaque TFH cells, defined as CXCR5+CD4 T cells, contain two major populations: PD-1(INT) and PD-1(HIGH) cells. Of these, PD-1(HIGH)CD4+ T cells highly co-express ICOS but little CCR7, and reside in lymph node germinal centers (GCs), but not in blood. These cells secrete IL-21 and express transcriptional factor Bcl-6 at higher levels than CXCR5+PD-1(INT)CD4+ T cells. In addition, the frequency of PD-1(HIGH)CD4+ T cells is low in lymph nodes of newborns, but increases with age. Levels of PD-1(HIGH)CD4+ T cells correlate with mature B cells in lymph nodes, and PD-1 blockade in PD-1(HIGH)CD4+ T and B cell co-cultures significantly inhibits IgG production. In summary, PD-1(HIGH)CD4+ T cells residing in GC represent a specific TFH subset that contributes to maturation of B cells and IgG production.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 13 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#19,941,677
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,563
of 31,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,043
of 236,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#62
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.