↓ Skip to main content

Pattern Recognition and Signaling Mechanisms of RIG-I and MDA5

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
335 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
470 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pattern Recognition and Signaling Mechanisms of RIG-I and MDA5
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Reikine, Jennifer B. Nguyen, Yorgo Modis

Abstract

Most organisms rely on innate immune receptors to recognize conserved molecular structures from invading microbes. Two essential innate immune receptors, RIG-I and MDA5, detect viral double-stranded RNA in the cytoplasm. The inflammatory response triggered by these RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) is one of the first and most important lines of defense against infection. RIG-I recognizes short RNA ligands with 5'-triphosphate caps. MDA5 recognizes long kilobase-scale genomic RNA and replication intermediates. Ligand binding induces conformational changes and oligomerization of RLRs that activate the signaling partner MAVS on the mitochondrial and peroxisomal membranes. This signaling process is under tight regulation, dependent on post-translational modifications of RIG-I and MDA5, and on regulatory proteins including unanchored ubiquitin chains and a third RLR, LGP2. Here, we review recent advances that have shifted the paradigm of RLR signaling away from the conventional linear signaling cascade. In the emerging RLR signaling model, large multimeric signaling platforms generate a highly cooperative, self-propagating, and context-dependent signal, which varies with the subcellular localization of the signaling platform.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 457 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 25%
Student > Master 69 15%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 10%
Student > Bachelor 46 10%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 87 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 108 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 69 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 7%
Chemistry 7 1%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 100 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,055,117
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,773
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,085
of 239,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#30
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.