The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regulatory T-Cells in Pregnancy: Historical Perspective, State of the Art, and Burning Questions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Grazia Ruocco, Gérard Chaouat, Laura Florez, Armand Bensussan, David Klatzmann |
| Abstract |
In this review, we first revisit the original concept of "suppressor T-cells" in pregnancy, put it in a historical perspective, and then highlight the main data that licensed its resurrection and revision into the concept of "regulatory T-cells" (Tregs) in pregnancy. We review the evidence for a major role of Tregs in murine and human pregnancy and discuss Treg interactions with dendritic and uterine natural killer cells, other players of maternal-fetal tolerance. Finally, we highlight what we consider as the most important questions in the field. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 35 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,080,377
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,768
of 32,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,232
of 248,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#66
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.