↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular Vesicle Profiling and Their Use as Potential Disease Specific Biomarker

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular Vesicle Profiling and Their Use as Potential Disease Specific Biomarker
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrike Julich, Arnulf Willms, Veronika Lukacs-Kornek, Miroslaw Kornek

Abstract

Cell-derived vesicles in particular extracellular vesicles (EVs) such as microparticles (MPs) and microvesicles besides exosomes are raising more and more attention as a novel and unique approach to detect diseases. It has recently become apparent that disease specific MP signatures or profiles might be beneficial to differentiate chronic liver diseases such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic hepatitis C, to monitor their progression or possibly to assess treatment outcome. Therefore EVs might serve as a novel inexpensive and minimally invasive method to screen risk patients for the outbreak of a disease even before the initial symptoms, to follow up treatment complications and disease relapse. The purpose of the current review is to summarize already published EVs signatures for a limited number of exemplary diseases and to discuss their possible impact. Additionally, it will be discussed if the combination of EV profiling and miRNA profiling could be a future joint tool for the purpose of detecting cancer and from far larger interest to ultimately distinguish among various tumor entities. EVs might increase the chance of early detection of chronic diseases or cancers especially if applied as part of yearly health screenings in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 23%
Student > Master 34 22%
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#8,556
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,276
of 248,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#45
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.