↓ Skip to main content

Ontogeny of Myeloid Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ontogeny of Myeloid Cells
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ismé De Kleer, Fabienne Willems, Bart Lambrecht, Stanislas Goriely

Abstract

Granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) represent a subgroup of leukocytes, collectively called myeloid cells. During the embryonic development of mammalians, myelopoiesis occurs in a stepwise fashion that begins in the yolk sac and ends up in the bone marrow (BM). During this process, these early monocyte progenitors colonize various organs such as the brain, liver, skin, and lungs and differentiate into resident macrophages that will self-maintain throughout life. DCs are constantly replenished from BM precursors but can also arise from monocytes in inflammatory conditions. In this review, we summarize the different types of myeloid cells and discuss new insights into their early origin and development in mice and humans from fetal to adult life. We specifically focus on the function of monocytes, macrophages, and DCs at these different developmental stages and on the intrinsic and environmental influences that may drive these adaptations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 331 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 22%
Researcher 51 15%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 75 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 67 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 74 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,423,388
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,230
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,580
of 249,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#5
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.