↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of Defective PS Recognition and Efferocytosis to Chronic Inflammation and Autoimmunity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of Defective PS Recognition and Efferocytosis to Chronic Inflammation and Autoimmunity
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00566
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stanley Gititu Kimani, Ke Geng, Canan Kasikara, Sushil Kumar, Ganapathy Sriram, Yi Wu, Raymond B. Birge

Abstract

The rapid and efficient clearance of apoptotic cells results in the elimination of auto-antigens and provides a strong anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive signal to prevent autoimmunity. While professional and non-professional phagocytes utilize a wide array of surface receptors to recognize apoptotic cells, the recognition of phosphatidylserine (PS) on apoptotic cells by PS receptors on phagocytes is the emblematic signal for efferocytosis in metazoans. PS-dependent efferocytosis is associated with the production of anti-inflammatory factors such as IL-10 and TGF-β that function, in part, to maintain tolerance to auto-antigens. In contrast, when apoptotic cells fail to be recognized and processed for degradation, auto-antigens persist, such as self-nucleic acids, which can trigger immune activation leading to autoantibody production and autoimmunity. Despite the fact that genetic mouse models clearly demonstrate that loss of PS receptors can lead to age-dependent auto-immune diseases reminiscent of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the link between PS and defective clearance in chronic inflammation and human autoimmunity is not well delineated. In this perspective, we review emerging questions developing in the field that may be of relevance to SLE and human autoimmunity.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2014.
All research outputs
#19,941,677
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,563
of 31,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,816
of 273,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#127
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.