↓ Skip to main content

S. mansoni Trapping in Lungs Contributes to Resistance to Reinfection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
S. mansoni Trapping in Lungs Contributes to Resistance to Reinfection
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Mark Knopf, Parmjeet Behl Suri

Abstract

Worm transplantation studies show that physiological and reproductive status of the worm is influenced by the microenvironment of the host and critical for vaccine design. Worm migration studies in rats with (75)Se-methionine labeled cercariae demonstrated that resistance to reinfection (R/R) requires a host immune response resulting in worm death. In permissive hosts, inflammation due to anti eggs immunity leads to host death, whereas in non-permissive hosts this is not the case due to reduced egg burdens. Eggs-induced pathology and inflammatory debris resulting from immune attack on worms are important for vaccine design. Protective immune responses are perhaps induced when naïve hosts are vaccinated with either schistosome-derived molecules or attenuated cercariae as suggested by the induction of protective anti-parasite antibodies and monoclonals. However, these immunological strategies rarely produce 85-90% R/R as is achievable by portal-caval shunting. Alternatively, induction of anti-schistosoma immunity may induce portacaval shunting, seems highly unlikely although not yet tested. Differential screening with sera from twice-infected rats, protective (F2x) from Fisher vs. non-protective (W2x) from Wistar-Furth rats, was used to identify candidate vaccine antigens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 5 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,412
of 31,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,314
of 279,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#142
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.