↓ Skip to main content

Tweeters, Woofers and Horns: The Complex Orchestration of Calcium Currents in T Lymphocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tweeters, Woofers and Horns: The Complex Orchestration of Calcium Currents in T Lymphocytes
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian L. Nohara, Shawna R. Stanwood, Kyla D. Omilusik, Wilfred A. Jefferies

Abstract

Elevation of intracellular calcium ion (Ca(2+)) levels is a vital event that regulates T lymphocyte homeostasis, activation, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The mechanisms that regulate intracellular Ca(2+) signaling in lymphocytes involve tightly controlled concinnity of multiple ion channels, membrane receptors, and signaling molecules. T cell receptor (TCR) engagement results in depletion of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca(2+) stores and subsequent sustained influx of extracellular Ca(2+) through Ca(2+) release-activated Ca(2+) (CRAC) channels in the plasma membrane. This process termed store-operated Ca(2+) entry (SOCE) involves the ER Ca(2+) sensing molecule, STIM1, and a pore-forming plasma membrane protein, ORAI1. However, several other important Ca(2+) channels that are instrumental in T cell function also exist. In this review, we discuss the role of additional Ca(2+) channel families expressed on the plasma membrane of T cells that likely contribute to Ca(2+) influx following TCR engagement, which include the TRP channels, the NMDA receptors, the P2X receptors, and the IP3 receptors, with a focus on the voltage-dependent Ca(2+) (CaV) channels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#22,575
of 31,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,517
of 280,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#125
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.