↓ Skip to main content

From the Reticuloendothelial to Mononuclear Phagocyte System – The Unaccounted Years

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From the Reticuloendothelial to Mononuclear Phagocyte System – The Unaccounted Years
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Yona, Siamon Gordon

Abstract

It is over 125 years since Ilya Metchnikoff described the significance of phagocytosis. In this review, we examine the early origins and development of macrophage research continuing after his death in 1916, through the period of the reticuloendothelial system. Studies on these cells resulted in a substantial literature spanning immunology, hematology, biochemistry, and pathology. Early histological studies on morphology and in situ labeling laid the foundations to appreciate the diversity and functional capacity of these cells in the steady state and during pathology. We complete this phagocyte retrospective with the establishment of the mononuclear phagocyte system nomenclature half a century ago.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 47 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Chemistry 9 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 53 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,956,162
of 26,800,077 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#7,543
of 33,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,107
of 278,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#35
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,800,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.