↓ Skip to main content

CD8+CD122+ T-Cells: A Newly Emerging Regulator with Central Memory Cell Phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CD8+CD122+ T-Cells: A Newly Emerging Regulator with Central Memory Cell Phenotypes
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junfeng Liu, Dacan Chen, Golay D. Nie, Zhenhua Dai

Abstract

CD8(+)CD122(+) T-cells have been traditionally described as antigen-specific memory T-cells that respond to previously encountered antigens more quickly and vigorously than their naïve counterparts. However, mounting evidence has demonstrated that murine CD8(+)CD122(+) T-cells exhibit a central memory phenotype (CD44(high)CD62L(high)), regulate T cell homeostasis, and act as regulatory T-cells (Treg) by suppressing both autoimmune and alloimmune responses. Importantly, naturally occurring murine CD8(+)CD122(+) Tregs are more potent in immunosuppression than their CD4(+)CD25(+) counterparts. They appear to be acting in an antigen-non-specific manner. Human CD8(+)CXCR3(+) T-cells are the equivalent of murine CD8(+)CD122(+) Tregs and also exhibit central memory phenotypes. In this mini-review article, we will summarize recent progresses in their phenotypes, homeostatic expansion, antigen-specificity, roles in the suppression of alloimmune and autoimmune responses, and the mechanisms underlying their inhibitory function.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 24 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,681,750
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#14,712
of 32,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,023
of 296,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#72
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.