↓ Skip to main content

The Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts Does Not Contribute to Pathology in a Mouse Mesenteric Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Injury Model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts Does Not Contribute to Pathology in a Mouse Mesenteric Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Injury Model
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00614
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mike C. L. Wu, Timothy D. Gilmour, Susanna Mantovani, Trent M. Woodruff

Abstract

The receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) can engage a diverse class of ligands and contribute to the immune and inflammatory response to infection and injury. It is known to be a pathogenic receptor in many inflammatory diseases, including ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injuries in several tissues; however, its role has not been investigated in IR injuries of the intestine to date. Mesenteric (or intestinal) IR leads to recruitment of inflammatory cells into intestinal interstitial spaces, which markedly disrupts intestinal mucosa. IR-induced mucosal injury is accompanied by the development of a local and systemic inflammatory response and remote organ injury, and results in high mortality in the clinic. We hypothesized that elimination of RAGE signaling using RAGE(-/-) mice would result in decreased local and remote organ injury and reduced inflammation in a mesenteric IR model, and thus be a target for therapeutic intervention. We found that RAGE ligands including HMGB-1 and C3a were elevated after mesenteric IR indicating the potential for enhanced RAGE activation in this model. However despite this, wild-type and RAGE(-/-) mice both displayed similar degrees of mesenteric injury, neutrophil infiltration, intestinal edema, cytokine generation, neutrophil mobilization, and remote organ injury after mesenteric IR. We, therefore, conclude that despite its role in other organ IR injuries, and the robust production of RAGE ligands after intestinal ischemia, RAGE itself does not directly influence tissue injury and the inflammatory response in mesenteric IR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#24,737
of 31,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,568
of 395,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#99
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.