↓ Skip to main content

Naïve T Cell Homeostasis Regulated by Stress Responses and TCR Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Naïve T Cell Homeostasis Regulated by Stress Responses and TCR Signaling
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Kamimura, Toru Atsumi, Andrea Stofkova, Naoki Nishikawa, Takuto Ohki, Hironao Suzuki, Kokichi Katsunuma, Jing-jing Jiang, Hidenori Bando, Jie Meng, Lavannya Sabharwal, Hideki Ogura, Toshio Hirano, Yasunobu Arima, Masaaki Murakami

Abstract

The survival of naïve T cells is believed to require signals from TCR-pMHC interactions and cytokines such as IL-7. In contrast, signals that negatively impact naïve T cell survival are less understood. We conducted a forward genetic screening of mice and found a mutant mouse line with reduced number of naïve T cells (T-Red mice). T-Red mice have a point mutation in the Kdelr1 gene, and their naïve T cells show enhanced integrated stress response (ISR), which eventually induces their apoptosis. Therefore, naïve T cells require a KDEL receptor-mediated mechanism that efficiently relieves cellular stress for their survival in vivo. Interestingly, naïve T cells expressing TCR with higher affinity/avidity to self-antigens survive in T-Red mice, suggesting the possible link between TCR-mediated survival and ISR-induced apoptosis. In this article, we discuss the regulation of naïve T cell homeostasis, keeping special attention on the ISR and TCR signal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 18%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2015.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#27,447
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,838
of 380,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#114
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.